Columbus Voyeurism Lawyer
ORC § 2907.08
Definition of Voyeurism
- Invading the privacy of another,
- For the purpose of sexual arousal or gratification
Overview and Potential Penalties
The law prohibiting voyeurism is aimed at penalizing “peeping toms.” Voyeurism is a misdemeanor of the third degree, which is punishable by up to 60 days in jail and a maximum penalty of $500. Unfortunately, there is a serious consequence of registration under the sexual offender law in Ohio, so these cases, while only misdemeanors, are very serious.
At Funkhouser Law, we know that everyone accused of voyeurism is presumed innocent. As such, we work hard to accomplish the most favorable outcome for each of our clients.
If you have been accused of voyeurism, please call Funkhouser Law for a free consultation with an experienced peer-rated lawyer.
Meet Our Team
When Your Future is On the Line, We're Here to Help
Our team is comprised of dedicated professionals who are passionate about providing top-notch legal representation. Get to know the individuals who are committed to your success.
Real Experiences from Our Clients
Dedicated to Your Defense
-
“I hope to never need his services again, but if I do I will definitely hire him again!”- K.B.
-
“He saved me over $6,000 in fines and court costs.”- J.J.
-
“So we were confused and disoriented but Mr. Funkhouser was really patient and highly professional every time we called or met with him.”- E.J.
-
“The thing I appreciate most about Doug was his honesty. I always felt like I could trust what he told me and in fact I was smart to do so.”- J.W.
-
“I was pleasantly surprised at the level of knowledge, patience and ownership taken while handling my case in front of the necessary people in court.”- T.G.
-
“Doug Funkhouser is one of the most intelligent and personable criminal defense attorneys in Ohio.”- B.G.
-
“Douglas Funkhouser came highly recommended from 2 of his previous clients whom I had a business relationship, so I set high expectations for him. Mr. Funkhouser met and exceeded those expectations.”- R.J.
-
“Doug met us at the courthouse and my anxiety went down another notch and it continued to go down and then was gone, knowing Doug was representing my son.”- E.F.
-
“As a lawyer I understood the problems facing me when I was cited for OVI. I knew Doug and his reputation, but still had much trepidation about my case. Through the course of his representation he alleviated these concerns and kept me calm.”- R.B.