Columbus Pandering Lawyer
ORC § 2907.322
Definition of Pandering
- With knowledge of the material,
- Creating, reproducing, or publishing obscene material
Defense
A defense exists for doctors, scientists, and other such professions who disseminate this kind of material for professional reasons. Please contact Funkhouser Law to learn more about other potential sentence-heightening and mitigating circumstances.
At Funkhouser Law, from the moment a client walks through the door, we presume that they are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. As such, we work hard to accomplish the most favorable outcome for each of our clients. If you have been accused of pandering, please call Funkhouser Law for a free consultation with an experienced, peer-rated lawyer.
Possible Penalties
Pandering is generally a felony of the fifth degree and if found guilty, carries with it a penalty of 6-12 months in prison and a fine of up to $2,500.
Real Experiences from Our Clients
Dedicated to Your Defense
-
“I sincerely felt like he had my best interests in mind and worked to get a fair and favorable outcome for me.”- C.M.
-
“I am certain my life would be in ruins had I hired different attorney.”- M.M.
-
“Douglas Funkhouser came highly recommended from 2 of his previous clients whom I had a business relationship, so I set high expectations for him. Mr. Funkhouser met and exceeded those expectations.”- R.J.
-
“He really helped me out. I know anyone that needs help with legal problems needs to contact Doug, he’s a life saver.”- W.M.
-
“You took a lot of the stress out of going to court and working around my schedule.”- David A.
-
“Now whenever someone needs legal services or advice, I immediately refer them to Doug Funkhouser because I know he will do a superb job of defending them.”- C.G.
-
“The thing I appreciate most about Doug was his honesty. I always felt like I could trust what he told me and in fact I was smart to do so.”- J.W.
-
“I was pleasantly surprised at the level of knowledge, patience and ownership taken while handling my case in front of the necessary people in court.”- T.G.
-
“As a lawyer I understood the problems facing me when I was cited for OVI. I knew Doug and his reputation, but still had much trepidation about my case. Through the course of his representation he alleviated these concerns and kept me calm.”- R.B.