Possession of Deadly Weapon While Under Detention
ORC § 2923.131
Simplified Definition
- Possession of a deadly weapon,
- While in detention or at a detention facility.
Overview
Detention, for the purposes of this law, refers to any time after someone has been placed under arrest, including in the police vehicle. Notably, just walking into a detention facility such as a prison or jail while possessing a deadly weapon, is enough to violate this law.
Potential Penalties
A violation of this Ohio law can be considered a felony of the second, third, fourth, or fifth degree depending on the surrounding circumstances. As such, a violation is punishable by up to 8 years in prison and a fine of up to $2,500.
At Funkhouser Law, from the moment a client walks through the door, we presume that they are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. As such, we work hard to accomplish the most favorable outcome for each of our clients.
If you have been accused of possession of a deadly weapon while under detention, please call Funkhouser Law for a free consultation with an experienced, peer-rated lawyer: (614) 756-2154.
Real Experiences from Our Clients
Dedicated to Your Defense
-
“As a lawyer I understood the problems facing me when I was cited for OVI. I knew Doug and his reputation, but still had much trepidation about my case. Through the course of his representation he alleviated these concerns and kept me calm.”- R.B.
-
“I hope to never need his services again, but if I do I will definitely hire him again!”- K.B.
-
“The thing I appreciate most about Doug was his honesty. I always felt like I could trust what he told me and in fact I was smart to do so.”- J.W.
-
“My family and I will recommend him and use him in the future if we need an attorney.”- R.A.
-
“I contacted Doug and he returned my call in a fast timely fashion, answering all my questions and making me feel confident about my case.”- J.E.
-
“Douglas Funkhouser came highly recommended from 2 of his previous clients whom I had a business relationship, so I set high expectations for him. Mr. Funkhouser met and exceeded those expectations.”- R.J.
-
“I sincerely felt like he had my best interests in mind and worked to get a fair and favorable outcome for me.”- C.M.
-
“He treated my case like he was fighting to save himself.”- J.L.
-
“So we were confused and disoriented but Mr. Funkhouser was really patient and highly professional every time we called or met with him.”- E.J.