Possessing Criminal Tools
ORC § 2923.24
Definition
- Having control or possession of a device,
- With purpose to use it criminally.
Overview
Possessing criminal tools is basically a law against having shanks or shivs. Notably, you do not have to be in prison to be charged with possessing criminal tools. However, this offense can also be a non-dangerous item like a check used in a forgery case. The statute just requires that the item be used by the defendant criminally.
Potential Penalties
Possessing criminal tools is generally a misdemeanor of the first degree and can be penalized by up to 100 days in jail and a fine of up to $1,000. However, if the criminal tool was used in the commission of a felony, the charge becomes a felony of the fifth degree and can be punished by up to 12 months in jail and a fine of up to $2500.
At Funkhouser Law, from the moment a client walks through the door, we presume that they are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. As such, we work hard to accomplish the most favorable outcome for each of our clients.
If you have been accused of possessing criminal tools, please call Funkhouser Law for a free consultation with an experienced, peer-rated lawyer: (614) 756-2154.
Real Experiences from Our Clients
Dedicated to Your Defense
-
“He really helped me out. I know anyone that needs help with legal problems needs to contact Doug, he’s a life saver.”- W.M.
-
“He treated my case like he was fighting to save himself.”- J.L.
-
“Doug Funkhouser is one of the most intelligent and personable criminal defense attorneys in Ohio.”- B.G.
-
“Now whenever someone needs legal services or advice, I immediately refer them to Doug Funkhouser because I know he will do a superb job of defending them.”- C.G.
-
“- Christy O.
Thank you Doug for your continued assistance with all of our business needs. Your personal contact and attentiveness to our requests are much appreciated. Your dedication and professionalism have truly been effective within all of our business and personal cases.
” -
“I was pleasantly surprised at the level of knowledge, patience and ownership taken while handling my case in front of the necessary people in court.”- T.G.
-
“As a lawyer I understood the problems facing me when I was cited for OVI. I knew Doug and his reputation, but still had much trepidation about my case. Through the course of his representation he alleviated these concerns and kept me calm.”- R.B.
-
“So we were confused and disoriented but Mr. Funkhouser was really patient and highly professional every time we called or met with him.”- E.J.
-
“The thing I appreciate most about Doug was his honesty. I always felt like I could trust what he told me and in fact I was smart to do so.”- J.W.